"Permit me to issue and control the money of the nation and I care not who makes its laws." Mayer Amsched Rothschild
Vladimir Lenin
“We make money the old fashioned way. We print it.” Art Rolnick, Chief Economist for the
Minneapolis Federal Reserve Bank
|
|
<update>
Typical Corporate Structure Compared with the Fed
The defining feature of a corporation is its legal independence from the people who create it. If a corporation fails, shareholders only stand to lose their investment, and employees will lose their jobs, but neither will be liable for debts that remain owing to the corporation's creditors. A corporation can be a for-profit company or a non-profit company. It can be a stock corporation or a non-stock corporation. A non-profit corporation will generally always be a non-stock company. A corporation may have one or many owners, and may be chartered in such a way that each owner has property in an equal share of the corporation.
The Federal Reserve System is in one sense a non-stock corporation, a public one but not publicly traded, where each owner holds an equal share. In another sense it is a private corporation, since its shares are not traded on the stock exchange.
Banks come in several flavors, commercial banks and savings and loan associations. In terms of ownership they can be non-stock corporations (such as mutual savings banks) or publicly traded stock corporations.
Corporations are generally chartered or registered at the state level, but have very few requirements imposed regarding their structure. National banks, however, are incorporated at the federal level, yet they still are structured in a way that is similar to state-chartered institutions. Shareholders meet at least annually, elect directors to a governing “board” which chooses one among them to be the chair. This board hires the operating and financial managers of the company and provide direction and guidance to the operation of the firm. This description holds true, largely, for financial and non-financial institutions.
Motivations for the Formation of a Typical Corporation and that of the Fed
Commercial banks have been required since 1863, to have a federal charter. The National Bank Act , amended in 1864, 1865 and 1866, mandated these banks to issue a national currency; it also imposed a tax of 10% on the notes of State banks to take effect on July 1, 1866 . The tax effectively forced all non-federal currency from circulation. As time went by this system was found deficient in failing to centralize banking, failing to end the deflation of the 19 th century, leaving intact an inelastic currency and immobile reserves.
These problems were to be relieved by the implementation of the Aldrich Plan . This plan would create twelve National Reserve Associations, whose actions would be controlled by a national board of commercial bankers. These associations would make loans to member banks, create money to make the currency more elastic, and would be fiscal agents of the U.S. government. However, this was a too blatant private system. The opposition led to new committee work, which finally crafted the Federal Reserve Act, enacted in 1913.
More important than the banking panics (of which there were not that many from 1865 through 1913), the tendency toward mild deflation during the 1900s placed tight control on the monetary system. The rich who owned the banks wanted a way to create inflation. You cannot have inflation-driven banking profits under an objective monetary system.
The objective of the Fed is to stabilize the monetary system, prevent asset bubbles, and to provide better supervision of the banks. The powers of the Fed enables it to stretch or shrink the total supply of money, thus decreasing or increasing interest rates. While member banks would benefit from lending out money at high rates, they depend on the spread between the rate at which they borrow and the rate at which they lend. No matter how great the spread is, however, if the rates are too high, borrowing is discouraged and bank profits fall.
Elastic money usually means a continually increasing money supply, which drives down rates, inviting customers to borrow more. Unfortunately this also discourages saving. It is essential in any economy that people have an excess, a savings which can be used to invest in developing the economy, new products and new firms. This can only come from forgoing consumption.
In the kind of economy that the Fed encourages, individuals and ordinary firms will not forgo consumption, save and be the source of investment. Instead, banks will tend to be the funders of new businesses and products.
The Fed was also created for the reason that banks often had too little access to reserves besides what was in their own vaults. Reserves were immobile. While cities usually had a dominant bank to which other banks could turn for liquidity in case of a run, many banks scattered across the country were defenseless. Standard practice had become loaning out nearly all of their capital, rather than just the bank's equity (what they owned free and clear). Often most of the gold they held was deposited by customers, and most of that was normally lent out. A run on the bank could force a bank to close, especially the most risk-taking “rogue banks.” Not only did this give banks a bad name, but also invited new entrants into banking, for the easy profits.
In actuality, the Federal Reserve System helped the member banks to become more risk-taking and also tended to make banking a more closed field, as the existing membership could set the rules for banking through the Fed, making their membership a cartel.
All member banks had the same reserve requirements, and would “loan up” to the same extent, pooling their unused reserves at the Fed. The Fed could move those reserves as needed when any member bank did get into trouble.
</update>
The purpose of the Fed – if the government needs to finance part of its budget by borrowing it could sell its bonds directly to the public, to banks and others. This need of the government in no way includes the need to create additional profit opportunities for the private banks. It does not require that banks should go beyond lending out more than what assets they hold free and clear.
The government's requirements do not entail its caring and feeding another institution that manipulates the money supply independently of the policies set by the President and Congress, and which regulates interest rates and reserve requirements in order that the rest of the banking world can lend out and earn interest on “excess reserves” up to ten times over (that multiplier being the inverse of the reserve ratio).
Someone might object that the government benefits from the fact that the Fed maintains a monetary system that tends to be elastic on the positive side, generally increasing the money supply more often than decreasing it, causing an inflationary trend. This benefits the government, in aiding its eventual repayment of debt by lowering the value of the dollar. True, this is default on the debt by stealth, taxation without representation.
However, the government could very well increase the money supply on its own through the Treasury Department. It cannot do this when borrowing by selling bonds to support its deficit spending. This borrowing temporarily removes money from the market. It would have to print new money. This would be inconvenient because the thievery would be much to open to discovery. The mystery of having it generated through the Fed works much better because the intuition of most people deems it understandable and proper.
The government can take care of its funding needs quite well without the Federal Reserve. This leaves the major and primary purpose of the Fed as being for the benefit of private banks, to set rates and enable the multiplying of amounts that can be loaned out and earn interest beyond their equity.
|
The government, in terms of its legitimate functions of providing defense and an objective legal system, does not need to depend on a Federal Reserve System. However, the banking cartel could not possibly carry out the money creation and multiple lending of the same funds without its use of government coercion. In order to do this in such a way that the scheme is not identified for what it really is, required a fuzzy definition of the functions of the Fed and a deceptive definition of its structure. |
|
How is the Fed structured? For all the details of this, consult the U.S. Code: Title 12, chapter 3. An alternate source is The Structure and Function document at the Atlanta Fed.
Each district bank has one or more subordinate branch banks, each with a similarly structured board. The New York Bank is clearly "the first among equals" since it not only sits in the world's financial center but serves as the Federal Open Market Committee's operating arm, conducting open market operations and foreign exchange intervention. Congress chartered these banks and, consequently, has oversight responsibilities for them.
See The NY Fed board
Who Owns the Fed?
Ownership -- The owners of the NY Fed include the largest American banks and the NY Fed may be partially owned by foreign banks, such as the Bank of England and the Rothschild banking dynasty. Fact is that some foreign banks operate subsidiary banks that are national banks in the NY Fed district. The importance of the NY Fed arguably enables it to exercise greater influence or control on the whole FRS.
What makes an institution part of the government?
a) purchase or sell any security (including any interest in the Thrift Plan for Employees of the Federal Reserve System, but not including shares of a money market mutual fund) during the seven calendar day period prior to and the day(s) of a meeting of the FOMC; or
b) hold any security for less than 30 days, other than shares of a money market mutual fund. http://www.newyorkfed.org/aboutthefed/ob43.pdf page 3.
"Well, first of all, the Federal Reserve is an independent agency, and that means, basically, that there is no other agency of government which can overrule actions that we take. So long as that is in place and there is no evidence that the administration or the Congress or anybody else is requesting that we do things other than what we think is the appropriate thing, then what the relationships are don't, frankly, matter.”
Run by a board of directors elected by share-holders
Everyone within the organization is paid by the company payroll
The board of directors require no government approval
Ownership is changeable by the trading of shares in the market
The value of the shares are determined by the market
The amount of the dividend payments, if any, are determined by the board of directors
Health benefits and retirement programs are private
The headquarters location is at the discretion of the board
The Internet presence is under the .com TLD, or any other than .gov
Unless it is registered as a non-profit, it is subject to taxation
It can be sued.
Its decisions are not subject to overruling by the President
Shareholders may be U.S. citizens or foreign holders – note that this holds true for the private banks that are Federal Reserve members and owners.
Who are the owners, the private banks who are members of the Fed, or its shareholders? The following is the list of members of the New York Federal Reserve District, ^ a b c http://www4.fdic.gov/IDASP/index.asp. Cookies must be enabled to use this interactive website. Choose the "Find Institutions" section. Then leave all of the fields with the default value then choose "find". Wait a few moments to be prompted to "save as". It will be about a 3.4MB .csv file that will be downloaded. This file can be viewed with a spreadsheet such as openoffice.org or Microsoft excel.
I entered only the "Founded After" date field with “1913/11/01” to select just the banks who were the members as of the founding of the Fed.
An important sample of this spreadsheet would be the members of the New York Federal Reserve District, which requires sorting the sheet on the “FED” column and selecting all of those with the “FED” value of “2”. Here are the 107 members of the NY Fed in late 1913:
Adirondack Bank
Alliance Bank, National Association
Amboy Bank
Apple Bank for Savings
Astoria Federal Savings and Loan Association
Atlas Savings and Loan Association
Ballston Spa National Bank
Bank of Akron
Bank of Baroda
Bank of Cattaraugus
Bank of China
Bank of China
Bank of Holland
Bank of India
Bank of Millbrook
Bank of Richmondville
Bank of Smithtown
Bessemer Trust Company
Bogota Savings Bank
Brooklyn Federal Savings Bank
Carthage Federal Savings and Loan Association
Cattaraugus County Bank
Cayuga Lake National Bank
Chemung Canal Trust Company
Community Bank, National Association
Cross County Federal Savings Bank
Deutsche Bank Trust Company Americas
Emigrant Bank
Fairfield County Bank
Fairport Savings Bank
First County Bank
First Federal Savings of Middletown
First Hope Bank, A National Banking Association
First Investors Federal Savings Bank
First Niagara Bank
First State Bank
Five Star Bank
Flatbush Federal Savings and Loan Association
Freehold Savings and Loan Association
Fulton Savings Bank
Gibraltar Savings Bank, FSB
Glens Falls National Bank and Trust Company
Gouverneur Savings and Loan Association
GSL Savings Bank
Hudson City Savings Bank
Kearny Federal Savings Bank
Lake Shore Savings Bank
Llewellyn-Edison Savings Bank, FSB
Manasquan Savings Bank
Manufacturers and Traders Trust Company
Maple City Savings Bank, FSB
Medina Savings and Loan Association
Metuchen Savings Bank
Millington Savings Bank
NBT Bank, National Association
New York Community Bank
Newtown Savings Bank
Northfield Bank
NVE Bank
Orange County Trust Company
Oritani Bank
Pamrapo Savings Bank, SLA
PathFinder Bank
Pioneer Savings Bank
Provident Bank
Putnam County Savings Bank
Rhinebeck Savings Bank
Rondout Savings Bank
Roselle Savings Bank
RSI BANK
Savings Bank of Danbury
Sawyer Savings Bank
Seneca Falls Savings Bank
Somerset Savings Bank, SLA
Steuben Trust Company
The Adirondack Trust Company
The Bank of Castile
The Bank of New York Mellon
The Bridgehampton National Bank
The Canandaigua National Bank and Trust Company
The Citizens National Bank of Hammond
The Delaware National Bank of Delhi
The Dime Svgs. Bank of Williamsburgh
The Elmira Savings Bank, FSB
The First National Bank of Dryden
The First National Bank of Groton
The First National Bank of Jeffersonville
The Lyons National Bank
The National Bank of Coxsackie
The National Bank of Delaware County
The National Union Bank of Kinderhook
The North Country Savings Bank
The Oneida Savings Bank
The Provident Bank
The Putnam County National Bank of Carmel
The Rome Savings Bank
The Stissing National Bank of Pine Plains
The Suffolk County National Bank of Riverhead
Tioga State Bank
Ulster Savings Bank
Union County Savings Bank
Union Savings Bank
Walden Savings Bank
Wallkill Valley Federal Savings and Loan Association
Watertown Savings Bank
Wilber National Bank
WSB Municipal Bank
Careful perusal of the list will convince anyone that foreign banks have set up subsidiaries in the NY district that have become member banks and thereby, owners of the Federal Reserve. Banks with the country names of Holland, India and China stand out. Among those who were not listed among these existing in 1913, more recently founded foreign bank branches is the Royal Bank of Scotland (RBS National Bank in Bridgeport, CT).
One might object that this does not mean foreign bank owners have any significant influence on American banking policy. What influence bankers have on government policy in general may be more important.
The following two tables of JP Morgan Chase shareholders can be found through the fiance.yahoo.com stock quote web-page, selecting the"Major Holders" link.
One national bank in particular has an ownership that is revealing. JP Morgan Chase is a member of the Philadelphia Fed, and has its chairman/CEO Jamie Dimon on the board of the New York Fed. Individuals are minor shareholders, such as the officers:
Holder Shares ReportedDIMON JAMES 2,992,503 25-Jan-08WINTERS WILLIAM T 1,225,912 25-Jan-08HARRISON WILLIAM B JR 1,173,569 31-Dec-06SCHARF CHARLES W 1,061,353 1-Feb-08BLACK STEVEN D 893,875 25-Jan-08
The significant shareholders are institutions:
TOP INSTITUTIONAL HOLDERS (as of 2008/06/30)
Holder
Shares
% Out
Value
“Barclays Global Investors”
157,667,999
4.59
$5,409,589,045
“AXA”
140,498,887
4.09
$4,820,516,812
“STATE STREET CORP”
131,086,954
3.81
$4,497,593,391
“VANGUARD GROUP, INC.”
107,840,912
3.14
$3,700,021,690
“FMR LLC”
97,127,149
2.83
$3,332,432,482
“ DAVIS SELECTED ADV, LP”
74,560,855
2.17
$2,558,182,935
“MORGAN STANLEY
55,908,016
1.63
$1,918,204,028
“Bank of New York Mellon”
54,224,873
1.58
$1,860,455,392
“Capital Research Global Invst”
51,293,900
1.49
$1,759,893,709
“NORTHERN TRUST CORP”
42,740,560
1.24
$1,466,428,613
The 1976 study by the House of Representatives [pdf] is the tip of the iceberg. The interlocking directorships between the Fed presidents and board members of private banks and other corporations is tight. Later interpretations which include family relationships, including heirs to ownership of private banks and different generations of wealthy persons participating in the Fed beg to make the conclusion that private control is strong.
<update>
Adding research into inter-marriages between banking families to the 1976 study of interlocking directorships, three authors published controversial books: Eustace Mullins, “ The Secrets of the Federal Reserve ,” (Bankers Research Institute, 1984) and Gary S. Kah, “ En Route to Global Occupation .”
Kah's list (p. 13) of original Fed owners (with about 300 stockholders) is:
Mullins' list (p. 33) is
Mullins created a long chart which builds on the 1976 House study of interlocking directorships, adding relationships by marriage and inheritance, to people of other generations. His list of the original owners of the Fed differs from that of Kah. One of them must be wrong, possibly both. I cannot tell.
There are many foreign banks who operate branch banks in the United States, most of which are national banks, i.e., are members of the Federal Reserve System. The Fed itself maintains a large listing of them. Consider the interests served by the Fed, in the light of the fact that many members are foreign entities, and that the owners of them and directors also serve on the boards of other foreign businesses, as do their American counterparts. Are we really to believe that the Fed exists to serve the end-users of banks, individuals and small businesses in the U.S?
Lastly, a few personal details of the current scene in 2008, of New York Fed member bank owners. Among the banks listed above which are NY Fed members, Deutsche Bank is noteworthy.
A profile from Forbes :
Deutsche Bank, AG, a large bank holding company headquartered in Frankfurt , Germany operates in several U.S. cities, including New York City , in banking and related businesses. It is headed by Josef Ackermann. He is also Deputy Chairman/Director of Siemens, AG. The 59-year old Ackermann, who “joined Deutsche Bank as a member of the Management Board in 1996, where he was responsible for the investment banking division. On May 22, 2002 , Dr. Ackermann was appointed Spokesman of the Management Board and Chairman of our Group Executive Committee. On February 1, 2006 , he was appointed Chairman of the Management Board. After studying Economics and Social Sciences at the University of St. Gallen , he worked at the University's Institute of Economics as research assistant and received a doctorate in Economics. Dr. Ackermann started his professional career in 1977 at Schweizerische Kreditanstalt (SKA) where he held a variety of positions in Corporate Banking, Foreign Exchange/Money Markets and Treasury, Investment Banking and Multinational Services. He worked in London and New York , as well as at several locations in Switzerland . Between 1993 and 1996, he served as President of SKA's Executive Board, following his appointment to that board in 1990. Dr. Ackermann is a member of the Supervisory Board of Siemens AG (Second Deputy Chairman) and a member of the International Advisory Council of Zurich Financial Services Group (since January 2007). Until April 2007, he was a member of the Supervisory Board of Bayer AG.”
Similar stories abound within the banks that are shareholders in the Fed and elect a number of Fed directors.
</update>
As the nation's central bank, the Federal Reserve derives its authority from the U.S. Congress. It is considered an independent central bank because its decisions do not have to be ratified by the President or anyone else in the executive or legislative branch of government, it does not receive funding appropriated by the Congress, and the terms of the members of the Board of Governors span multiple presidential and congressional terms. The Fed's financial independence arises because it is hugely profitable, among others, due to its ownership of government bonds. It returns billions of dollars to the government each year.
The biggest benefit to government is the passive role that the government can take in defaulting on its debt. It can spend billions per year beyond tax collections. On the model of what Germany did in 1923- the expansion of money supply is used to make repayment of government borrowing incredibly cheap.
Germany let its money supply expand four-fold, ending with the proverbial stories of wheelbarrows of cash needed to buy a load of bread. See the German Railroad Notes article. The original number of Deutsche Marks needed to repay the national debt was soon trivial. However, government debts to other nations remained a crushing burden since it was denominated in Gold Marks.
The Federal Reserve is subject to oversight by the Congress, which periodically reviews its activities and can alter its responsibilities by statute. Also, the Federal Reserve must work within the framework of the overall objectives of economic and financial policy established by the government. The hyper-inflation that Germany experienced is of course not at all what the Fed would want. Nevertheless, a phenomenon of ninety years ago fades from memory. At least the fact that the result was not intended is forgotten. Fact is that once hyper-inflation starts, it roars on to catastrophe with no way to stop it.
As long as government debt is not denominated in an objective store of value such as gold, government keeps on borrowing, whether the economy crashes or not. Moreover, bankers are like cats, they always land feet down.
Putting aside citations from books and articles that propagate conspiracy theories, if we look for cogent evidence of private control of the Fed, two well-researched aspects stand out.
Underlying the original function of the Act and the strengthened structure in the amendments of 1933 and 1935, but especially a Congressional study in 1976, we can gain a good understanding of the degree to which the Fed was subject to influence by private corporation directors. This relies on the appearance of certain names, usually well-connected upper society members, as directors of various Fed banks and of member banks and other corporations in their districts.
This is broadly bolstered by the fact of the large, primary benefit to the private banks who are members of the association, through being able to encourage borrowing by manipulation of interest rates and readily available credit and being able to lend out (among the group of banks) the same amount of reserves up to ten times, earning up to ten times the normal interest on any given amount of increased reserves.
The Federal Reserve System is a mixed ownership institution. The BOG is owned by the government, but the twelve Federal Reserve Banks are privately owned by the member banks in their districts. It took a genius to conceive of an institution clouded in so much confusion. Perhaps more than one. The chief among them was Paul Warburg. The Fed is a rare combination of public and private organizational forms and titles, with a mixture of elements of ownership and control unrivaled in the world. It is a true Chimera.
The final operative factor is “control” rather than any traditional concept of ownership. Traditionally, to own something means that you can use it in any manner you see fit as long as you do not harm anyone else, and freedom to dispose of it. The member banks do not have this kind of control. But neither does the government. The government can close it down, but there are strict limits in law and firm public expectations to prevent free use of the Federal Reserve System for whatever the government may think up.
Although there are several features of the Fed and its activities that indicate it is under some control by the government, much of the evidence supports the fact that it is independent of the government.
When banking giants J.P. Morgan, the First National Bank of New York , the National City Bank of New York, and Kuhn, Loeb & Company met at Jekyll Island in 1910 to plan the creation of the Federal Reserve, it cannot be said that their motivation was to curb their own power and wealth. All objective knowledge being contextual, so also is certainty.
In the context of the available evidence it is certain that the Fed is a combination of a truly hungry private business and a fascist government.
